Transform your patent workflow with Patentopia
Complete prior-art review faster and more comprehensively. Examine feature-level overlap, novelty, inventive step, and claim strategy in one structured platform.
Illustrative screening findings for professional review, not a legal opinion or grant prediction.
Supported patent and scientific-literature sources · EPO patent data · Targeted prior-art discovery · EPC-aligned methodology
One workflow for the teams responsible for filing decisions
Patentopia turns a submitted claim and its supporting disclosure into a traceable professional review record. Search decisions, document evidence, novelty, inventive step, and approved claim changes remain linked throughout the workflow.
- ✓For patent professionals: Inspect feature-to-document evidence before drawing a conclusion.
- ✓For technology-transfer teams: Compare disclosures consistently before committing filing resources.
- ✓For in-house IP teams: Preserve a reviewable record from initial disclosure to claim strategy.
Three steps to an evidence-based assessment
Closest Prior-Art Candidates
Feature overlapFrom submitted claim to reviewable claim strategy
Patentopia preserves the relationship between the submitted claim, approved technical features, search queries, reviewed sources, legal analysis, and any user-approved claim changes. The result is a reviewable assessment record rather than an unexplained score.
Evidence-led review across supported sources
Our platform searches supported patent and literature sources, ranks candidate prior art, and presents the evidence for professional review.
Financial Efficiency
Use a staged assessment before committing to deeper professional review.
Speed
Move from source discovery to a structured first-pass review in one workflow.
Structured Analysis
Compare complex documents consistently and surface evidence for professional review.
Security
Trust in a platform that prioritizes the confidentiality of your innovative ideas.
Built for the teams that decide what gets filed
Patentopia sits at the front of your IP workflow, as the triage step before attorney hours and filing fees. It standardizes the first-pass opinion so every disclosure is judged on the same evidence.
University TTOs
Review researcher disclosures in a structured first pass before deciding which cases need deeper attorney review.
- ✓Screen disclosures at the volume your faculty produce
- ✓Consistent first-pass opinions across departments
- ✓Spend external counsel budget only where it pays off
IP-heavy organisations
For teams filing more than ten patents a year, the bottleneck is the first read. Run every technical disclosure through the same structured pipeline before it enters the docket, and give your IP managers a head start on each case.
- ✓Triage every disclosure on a single rubric
- ✓Prior-art citations ready before the attorney memo
- ✓Structure the early-stage filing decision around cited evidence
Patent consultants & attorneys
Start from a structured draft instead of a blank page. Patentopia returns a per-feature novelty matrix, an EPC problem-solution walkthrough, and claim amendments you can review, edit, and bill against, rather than a black-box score.
- ✓Per-feature novelty matrix with document locations
- ✓EPC Art. 56 problem-solution reasoning, shown in full
- ✓Editable claim amendments, current to suggested text
Review the complete assessment output
Inspect a representative report before deciding whether Patentopia fits your workflow.