One evidence-linked patentability workflow
Literature search, novelty, inventive step, and claim strategy remain linked to the approved claim, reviewed documents, and recorded evidence. Patent professionals can inspect the reasoning, check the citations, and decide what to do next.
Literature Search
Targeted topic extraction and semantic search across supported scientific-literature and patent sources. Identifies and ranks candidate prior art without retaining submitted disclosure text as a search cache.
- Topic extraction direct from your claims
- Crossref scientific-literature coverage
- EPO patent database coverage
- Google Patents public-data retrieval and source links
- Relevance scoring with justifications
- English search; native Chinese, Japanese and Korean queries when enabled
- Ranked candidate register with source links
Novelty Checker
Structured claim decomposition into approved technical features, each mapped against the reviewed prior-art documents. Feature-level evidence supports a separate whole-claim novelty conclusion under EPC Article 54.
- Claim-to-feature conversion with approval
- Feature-by-feature disclosure analysis
- Per-feature prior art mapping
- Conflict identification with citations
Inventive Step Assessment
Structured EPC problem-solution approach to assess whether the claimed subject-matter appears to involve an inventive step over the identified prior-art combinations.
- EPC problem-solution approach
- Closest prior art identification
- Technical effect analysis
- Obviousness assessment with reasoning
Claim Strategy
Identifies weaknesses in your proposed claims and recommends specific reformulations to overcome prior art exposure. Suggestions require support in the supplied source and professional review.
- Weakness identification in claims
- Specific reformulation suggestions
- Prior art exposure mitigation
- Claim strengthening strategies
What you get
Patentability Assessment
Novelty and inventive step evaluated separately, with feature-level evidence, prior-art citations, and conclusions prepared for IP-team review.
Opposition Report
In developmentGrounds for opposition and the vulnerable claims in a competitor patent, mapped to the prior art.
Prosecution Dialogue
In developmentDraft responses to office actions and examiner objections for your attorneys to review and refine.
FTO Mapping
In developmentFreedom-to-operate analysis mapping a product against relevant patent claims.
Review the report before starting a case
Inspect the feature model, search record, disclosure matrix, novelty analysis, inventive-step routes, and claim-amendment workflow in a complete sample assessment.